Improve general contracting to strengthen the effectiveness of the italian public commissioning bodies in managing of the construction process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/4059Keywords:
client, contract law, international comparison, ppp (public-private partnership), procurement, project-construction-managementAbstract
The EU Directive 93/37 defined the “third kind” of tender procedures, that a public commissioning body may use to select a figure that is responsible for "the realization, by whatever means, of a work corresponding to the requirements specified by the contracting authority".
Italy has interpreted in an original way this tender procedure, introducing (through law 443/2001) the role of “contraente generale”.
The point is that the notion of “contraente generale” still remains controversial on the ground of international comparisons, especially in terms of risk allocation between public client and contractor.
The paper presents some results of a study on the Italian “contraente generale” scheme, compared with the procurement models as identified by the available international literature.
In conclusion, some recommendations are made for the adaptation of the Italian legislation, allowing to improve its compatibility with the ppp model generally adopted in Europe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Ernesto Antonini, Aldo Norsa
Copyrights and publishing rights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
Metadata
All the metadata of the published material is released in the public domain and may be used by anyone free of charge. This includes references.
Metadata — including references — may be re-used in any medium without prior permission for both not-for-profit and for-profit purposes. We kindly ask users to provide a link to the original metadata record.