Improve general contracting to strengthen the effectiveness of the italian public commissioning bodies in managing of the construction process

Authors

  • Ernesto Antonini University of Bologna
  • Aldo Norsa Politecnico di Milano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/4059

Keywords:

client, contract law, international comparison, ppp (public-private partnership), procurement, project-construction-management

Abstract

The EU Directive 93/37 defined the “third kind” of tender procedures, that a public commissioning body  may use to select a figure that is responsible for "the realization, by whatever means, of a work corresponding to the requirements specified by the contracting authority".
Italy has interpreted in an original way this tender procedure, introducing (through law 443/2001) the role of “contraente generale”.
The point is that the notion of “contraente generale” still remains controversial on the ground of international comparisons, especially in terms of risk allocation between public client and contractor.
The paper presents some results of a study on the Italian “contraente generale” scheme, compared with the procurement models as identified by the available international  literature.
In conclusion, some recommendations are made for the adaptation of the Italian legislation, allowing to improve its compatibility with the ppp model generally adopted in Europe.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-17

How to Cite

Antonini, E., & Norsa, A. (2013). Improve general contracting to strengthen the effectiveness of the italian public commissioning bodies in managing of the construction process. IN_BO. Ricerche E Progetti Per Il Territorio, La Città E l’architettura, 4(2), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/4059