Negotiating and Designing Public Space. Experiences with a new M.Sc. in Urban Design Program in Hong Kong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/3712Keywords:
spazio pubblico, Hong Kong, negoziazione, progetto urbanoAbstract
This contribution reflects on first experiences made with a newly launched Master of Science in Urban Design program at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. As an important part of this program, students have to develop their design proposal in response to feedback of different stakeholders and community members. Thus the program responds to the growing aspiration of Hong Kong’s citizens to shape the urban development of their city and a lack of a meaningful participation process in the region. With its high density, protected country parks, efficient public transport and large scale housing program, generally, Hong Kong offers important lessons for contemporary urbanism. However, since the end of the British colonial rule and in face of increasing property prices, pollution and the disappearance of local heritage, intensive debates started about the regions future.
Another central point of the recent discussion in Hong Kong – and key theme of the new urban design program - is the demand for the rights and qualities of public space. The paper presents the set-up of the design studio, which was closely linked to a course on “urban processes”. During the semester, students had to organize community forums and street exhibitions in a specific district, invite stakeholders and residents and discuss with them their ideas. Their projects, then, had to respond on the various feedbacks and integrate them in their design and policy proposals.
The text reflects on the student projects and the lessons learned in the process. It addresses general questions such as the challenges in communicating with a diverse community (e.g. language barriers and culturally different ideas of public space). It addresses the question of the intended and unintended effects of a participatory design studio in the community, and possible follow-ups. And it reflects on the general role of design and designers in shaping community spaces.
References
Castells, Manuel, Goh, L., and Kwok, R.Y.W. (1990), The Shek Kip Mei syndrome: economic development and public housing in Hong Kong and Singapore, Pion Ltd., London.
Certeau, Michel de (1984), The practice of everyday life, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Conforti, Claudia (1980), Il Gallaratese di Aymonino e Rossi, Officina Edizioni, Rome.
Cuff, Dana (2012), Urban design: the city as project, in Ockman, Joan (ed.) with Williamson, Rebecca, Architecture school: three centuries of educating architects in North America, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Washington DC & MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass./London, England, pp. 409-413.
Cuthbert, Alexander R. (2011), Understanding cities: method in urban design, Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York
Cuthbert, Alexander R., & McKinnell, Keith G. (1997), Ambiguous space, ambiguous rights - corporate power and social control in Hong Kong, in Cities, Vol. 14, 5, pp. 295-311.
Genthe, Arnold (1984), Genthe's photographs of San Francisco's old Chinatown, photographs by Arnold Genthe; selection & text by John Kuo Wei Tchen, 1869-1942, Dover Publications, New York.
Harvey, David (2005), A brief history of neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, New York.
Harvey, David, The right to the city, in New Left Review, vol. 53, Sept-Oct 2008, pp. 23-40.
Hou, Jeffrey (ed.) (2010), Insurgent public space: guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities, Routledge, New York.
Hou, Jeffrey (2013), Community Owned Public Space Seattles Alternatives to POPS, in SUR: Sustainable Urban Regeneration, 25, pp. 74-77.
Jencks, Charles (1978), The language of post-modern architecture, Academy Editions, London.
Kayden, Jerold S., Privately owned public space: The New York City experience, The New York City Department of City Planning, the Municipal Art Society of New York, 2000.
Klemek, Christopher, The transatlantic collapse of urban renewal: postwar urbanism from New York to Berlin, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
Lien, Chen-Yu and Shih, Pei-Yin (2013), Temporary Privately Owned Public Space in Taipei. A Flexible Space Opens the Social Realm, in SUR: Sustainable Urban Regeneration, 25, pp. 66-69.
Mennel, Timothy, Steffens, Jo and Klemek, Christopher (eds.) (2007), Block by block: Jane Jacobs and the future of New York, Municipal Art Society of New York: Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
Ng, M.K. and Hills, P. (2003), World cities or great cities? A comparative study of five Asian metropolises, in Cities, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 151-165.
Sanders, Jeffrey C. (2010), Roots of Urban Sustainability. Inventing Ecotopia, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Schuman, Anthony W. (2012), Community Engagement. Architecture’s Evolving Social Vocation, in Joan Ockman (ed.) with Rebecca Williamson, Architecture school: three centuries of educating architects in North America, Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture Washington DC and MIT Press Cambridge, Mass./London, England, pp. 252-259.
Shiffman, Ron [et al.] (eds.) (2012), Beyond Zuccotti Park: freedom of assembly and the occupation of public space, New Village Press, Oakland, CA.
Smith, Peter Cookson (2006), The urban design of impermanence: streets, places and spaces in Hong Kong, MCCM Creations, Hong Kong.
Tafuri, Manfredo (1976), Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Tieben, Hendrik with S. Ho & Y. Mi (2010), Reclaiming Hong Kong’s Public Space, School of Architecture, CUHK, Hong Kong.
Tieben, Hendrik (2010), The Origin of Hong Kong Building Types, in E. Christ & C. Gantenbein (eds.), Hong Kong Typology, GTA Publishers (ETH Zurich), Zurich, pp. 33-56.
Tieben, H., Woo, P.L. & Yuet T.C. (2008), Development or Destruction? The Transformation of Sai Ying Pun, in Pearson, V. and Ko T.K. (eds.), A Sense of Place: Hong Kong West of Pottinger Street, Joint Publishing Company Limited, Hong Kong, pp. 168-183.
Whyte, William H. (1980), The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces, The Conservation Foundation, Washington DC.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Hendrik Tieben, Sujata Govada
Copyrights and publishing rights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
Metadata
All the metadata of the published material is released in the public domain and may be used by anyone free of charge. This includes references.
Metadata — including references — may be re-used in any medium without prior permission for both not-for-profit and for-profit purposes. We kindly ask users to provide a link to the original metadata record.
