Contents vs. container? Predictive impact criteria and resiliency limits in the perspective of sustainable refurbishment

Authors

  • Marco Morandotti University of Pavia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/3485

Keywords:

sustainable refurbishment, predictive impact criteria, valorisation

Abstract

One of most relevant playground of the debate concerning the sustainable refurbishment of cultural heritage is focused on its valorisation. Neither a conservative approach, unavailable for every kind of heritage re-use, neither the opposite, devoted to its intensive economical exploitation, seem to be sustainable in a mid-term perspective. Moving on a recently ended research, the paper aims to stress the topic in a holistic “life cycle oriented” approach.

References

Arcolao, Carla, La diagnosi nel restauro architettonico (2008), Marsilio, Venezia

Bertoldini, Marisa, Campioli Andrea, (2008) Cultura tecnologica e ambiente, Città Studi, Milano

Cecchi, Roberto, Gasparoli, Paolo, (2010) Prevenzione e manutenzione per i beni culturali edificati, Alinea, Firenze

Delmastro, Michele, Martinelli Nicola, Marsocci Lorenzo, (2000) La manutenzione programmata in edilizia: metodi e strumenti operativi, dalla progettazione alla gestione dei patrimoni, Il Sole 24 Ore Ed., Milano

Gasparoli, Paolo, Talamo, Cinzia (2006) Manutenzione e recupero. Criteri, metodi e strategie per l’intervento sul costruito, Alinea, Firenze

Lavagna, Monica, (2008), Life Cycle Assessment in edilizia. Progettare e costruire in una prospettiva di sostenibilità ambientale, Hoepli, Milano.

Published

2012-12-31

How to Cite

Morandotti, M. (2012). Contents vs. container? Predictive impact criteria and resiliency limits in the perspective of sustainable refurbishment. IN_BO. Ricerche E Progetti Per Il Territorio, La Città E l’architettura, 3(5), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/3485

Issue

Section

Sustainable refurbishment